I don't know how Porno Pete feels about these particular Mittens.Moreover, he says that wingnuts who like Mittens should apologize to America! It’s not common for a Religious Right leader to ask voters to apologize before an election, but this is Porno Pete we’re a-dealin’ with. Anyway, Porno Pete does not like Mittens because:

Peter LaBarbera, founder of Republicans For Family Values blog (www.rffv.net), issued the following response to GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s increasingly bold defense of homosexual “rights”:

I tweeted the following in light of Romney’s bold embrace of homosexuality-based “rights” — voiced in last night’s FOX debate and previously to the Des Moines Register editorial board:

“Every pro-family leader or group that said they opposed the Homosexual Lobby (and raised $$ on that) — yet supported Romney — now owes us an apology.”

Oh, Porno Pete’s gloves are off now about Mittens! [I see what I did there.] All you Mittens-loving wingnuts should apologize to Porno Pete for supporting the single candidate in the running for the GOP nomination who has a chance of mustering up at least 45% of the popular vote!

If Romney wins the Republican nomination, it will be a huge blow to the pro-family movement and our efforts to stop the normalization of sexual perversion. Romney personifies the failure of the current “marriage-only” approach toward resisting “same-sex marriage” — i.e., the idea that homosexuality is not the issue, but only “defending marriage.” Here is the supposed GOP standard-bearer saying that he has stood tall for real marriage (a fib, according to Mass Resistance writer Amy Contrada, author of “Mitt Romey’s Deception”) — and yet, like some soulless post-modern, he proudly embraces legal “rights” based on a Crime Against Nature that once dared not speak its name. (And did I mention that Romney flouts his own Mormon religion?)

HOW DARE A MEMBER OF A RELIGION SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT FROM PORNO PETE’S “FLOUT” IT SO?! And how dare he concede that an entire minority population deserves at least some dignity? That’s not the fundamentalist Christianity I was raised with!

According to Contrada’s well-researched book, Romney — who just reiterated his support for open homosexuals in the military:

  • Supported homosexual “domestic partnership” laws in MA;
  • Issued pro-“Gay Youth Pride” proclamations as Massachusetts governor and fully supported his own “Governor’s Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth”;
  • Refused to sign the 2002 proposed Massachusetts Citizens for Marriage ballot referendum for a constitutional marriage amendment (he thought it was too extreme because it excluded “civil unions”); and
  • Bragged in 1994 Senatorial campaign debate that he would do more to mainstream homosexual rights than Ted Kennedy.

Duh. Anyone who hasn’t figured out by now that Mitt Romney changes his political positions at least as often as he changes underpants is an idiot.

Is (was) our “pro-family” fight against homosexual activism the defense of God’s timeless Truth or merely a money-making charade?

Oh, Porno Pete, it’s truth-telling time. You’re going to want to sit down for this. You see, for people like you who don’t actually make a lot of money hating gays, it’s about the cause. You are the “useful idiots” in this equation. For those who have actually figured out how to profit off of it, it’s about controlling people, and yes, about money.

Some Christians and conservative leaders either have been fooled by Romney, or bought into the thinking of “establishment” Republican VIPs (e.g., Ann Coulter) who say Only Mitt Can Win. I don’t believe that for a minute

Well, no one ever accused you of being a good interpreter of political trends, Pete…

Anyway, Mitt will lose too, because Republicans hate him, but all the others in the race are clowns, so I understand and am amused by the dejection wingnuts are feeling right about now.